Just a little thought.
We have always been saying that 1+1 should be 3, because of synergies.
Because the first 1 is different from the first 1, so that’s why they make 3.
3 means more complexity, that it’s more difficult to get a project achieved, because you have communication problems. So I think that this equation does not reflect the reality because the first 1 should be different from the second 1.
Jean-Claude Van Damme said 1+1=11. And he’s right. You put two ones together, and because they’re different, they don’t mix. That’s the normal case.
1+1=1. That’s the best case, those two 1s understand each other and can communicate, so that they can become another being.
So those three 1s are different.
You would say “Hey, the result is not accurate”.
And you’re right. And you’re right.
Two rights make a right.
I rest my case.
3 Comments to "1+1=1"
You can follow all the replies to this entry through the comments feed
You’re so wrong. Jean-Claude Van Damme said “1 plus 1 égale 1, quand on arrive a s’unir avec dieu on devient se qu’on appelle un miracle.”
oui mais il a aussi dit “…1 + 1 = 11, et ca c’est beau”
Oula… C’est vraiment sur les posts les plus bizarres qu’il y a le plus de commentaires